|
Sale 8
|
|
press UP arrow key to increase the zoom ratio.
press DOWN arrow key to decrease the zoom ratio.
press RIGHT arrow key to increase the zoom window size.
press LEFT arrow key to decrease the zoom window size.
|
|
Lot 1115
One of the Finest Known 1877 Cents. PCGS graded MS-66 Red. This is an outstanding gem example with vibrant luster and great strike. At present there are 5 examples graded by PCGS with none graded higher. The obverse is virtually mark free, while the reverse does show two light contact marks under the E in CENT and between the E in ONE and the wreath. There is also a mark hidden in the wreath at 3:00. Other areas of alternating luster are Mint caused. There are two planchet voids to the right of the E in ONE caused by a liquid, probably machine oil, on the planchet at the time of striking. There are light unobliterated planchet marks on the high points of the right wreath. Three or four light clash marks are visible above the O and E in ONE. These are transferred from the chin and last feather of the obverse portrait. The clashing and Mint made anomalies are not grade limiting. This example is an exquisite example and probably ranks as 3rd or 4th finest known.
All non-proof 1877 Indian cents are seen struck using one reverse die, which shows a shallow N in ONE. This is a reverse type used from the 1860's until 1869 and sporadically thereafter until 1873. This reverse die shows no die cracks, although 90% of this issue show the clashing described above. How could the entire mintage of 852,000 pieces have been struck with only one reverse? I do not have an answer. Mint records show 6 reverse dies being produced for regular coinage in 1877, but 4 were not used until 1878, leaving 2 reverse dies used for 1877. Where are the coins struck from the second die? Is that one of the proof dies? Either the actual mintage is even lower than the number customarily reported, or the entire batch of 1877's from a second die is missing.
The mintage of 1877's was an all time low for the series, not to be underproduced until the 1909 San Francisco Mint Indian Cent. It is true that the low mintage is due in part to a slowdown in the economy, which forced large quantities of older cents back into circulation. This caused the Mint to produce less new cents. However, this explanation oversimplifies the cause and effect. To get to the real reason of the scarcity of cents of this date we must go back to the Mint act of 1864, which gave a limited legal tender limit of only ten cents to the new bronze cent. No special legislative action was made to allow Banks to move the quantities of cents that accumulated in their vaults. The action needed to alleviate this problem came in the form of the Mint act of March 3, 1871, which required The Mint to redeem the older minor coins in any quantity. At first the coins, which in addition to bronze cents included older copper cents, half cents, copper-nickel cents, bronze two cent pieces, nickel three cents and nickel five cent pieces, were melted and recoined into new three and five cent nickels and bronze cents. By 1874, as less and less of the pre-1864 coinage was being redeemed it became obvious that the remaining bronze cents and nickel coinage could just be taken in and paid out without going through the recoinage process. The Mint then operated as a clearinghouse for the backlog of minor coins, reissuing them side by side with newly minted coins. Since the coins were already on the books from their original mintage, they were accounted for separately from the mintage of new coinage. With the surge of redemption in 1877, new coinage was cut off early in the year. Over 10 million cents were issued in 1877, but less than 1 million of them were new coins carrying that date. The rest of the issuance was made up of older coins.
Estimated Value $30,000-UP.
Includes Eagle Eye Photo Seal.
|
| |
| Realized $29,900 |
|
